Posts Tagged insurance
New Jersey Attorney Ethics Investigations – The Ten-Day Letter
Posted by Metro in Uncategorized on January 21, 2012
You have just received a ten day letter from the NJ Attorney Ethics Committee. Someone has filed a grievance against you, and you are now a respondent in an Ethics matter. a person identifying herself as an Investigator for the Attorney Ethics Committee has given you ten days in which to reply in writing and to provide certain records and documents. Perhaps the grievant was a client or a former client. Perhaps it was an adversary. hopefully, it was not a judge. you are instructed to cooperate with the investigation.
At this point, you should review your E & O coverage, specifically the notice requirements and terms of coverage. As required, advise your E & O carrier of the pending investigation. not only may they provide counsel for you in an appropriate case, but your failure to advise them may result in forfeiture of coverage in a potential malpractice suit down the line. With or without insurance, you don’t have much time to respond Ethics.
Intuition says you should exercise your right to remain silent; practice tells you to try to forestall the investigation. should you cooperate with your prosecutors? Suppose you believe that your documents may actually result in the filing of criminal charges against you? what if the investigator asks you questions whose truthful answers would be an admission of crime. can they make you testify? what can they do if you don’t? what about the fifth Amendment?
There are a few facts you should know. the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE), under the state Supreme Court, is responsible for attorney discipline in new Jersey. It investigates all grievances against all attorneys. If the OAE decides that your case requires immediate attention, or if you happen also to be a defendant in criminal proceedings, the ethics case may be handled directly by the OAE in Trenton. in such a case, the Investigator who contacted you is probably a paid professional. Sometimes, the case originates automatically when an Attorney Trust Account check bounces. those cases, too, are generally handled out of Trenton. It is not often clear from the first letter or phone call.
Most grievances, however, are investigated by the District Ethics Committees, (DEC), whose investigators are attorney volunteers in districts around the state. following its investigation, the DEC will determine whether discipline may be required. If so, a formal Complaint will be filed. Other times, the grievance is dismissed. Sometimes, in minor cases, you may be offered diversion, a non-disciplinary, conditional resolution of the case. in all cases, you ultimately have the right to a full evidentiary hearing on the charges.
It is important that you know that the OAE has the power to summarily suspend your license merely for your refusal to respond to respond to the ten-day letter. Usually, you will be given a few extra days to comply, if you need them, but your additional or continued failure to cooperate with the investigation (or even the mere appearance of such) can result in additional measures against you, including, in appropriate cases, summary disbarment. While the Ethics Committee cannot put you in jail, it can do something that the criminal courts cannot: it may penalize you for pleading the fifth. Unlike the trier of fact in a criminal case, an Ethics Committee Hearing Panel and the rest of the OAE, and even the Supreme Court, may draw a negative inference from your non-cooperation or your failure to appear or produce evidence or from your refusal to testify.
That is because there is no Constitutional, or even statutory right, to practice law – there only a license, not unlike a driver’s license. where a trade or profession must be regulated by the state, and the practitioners must be licensed, the state may impose conditions and restrictions on that license. Accused violators do not get a jury, and the standard of proof is clear and convincing, not the Constitution’s no reasonable doubt standard.
Of course, if your ethics case also involves (or may involve) criminal charges against you or your client or someone in your firm, consult immediately with an attorney who has appropriate expertise. the issues are complex, the stakes are high, and there is no standard approach.
New Jersey Attorney Ethics decisions invariably give credit to attorneys who cooperate fully with investigations against them. They generally discipline attorneys who don’t. While you should always have experienced counsel whenever you are the focus of an ethics grievance, if you wish to continue to practice law, cooperation with Ethics is a no-brainer.
New Jersey Attorney Ethics Investigations – The Ten-Day Letter
Drug Rehab – How to get State Funded Rehab
Posted by Metro in Uncategorized on January 21, 2012
There are thousands of state and federally funded treatment beds available across the nation, and most people in real financial distress will qualify for at least some degree of subsidized care. some of the facilities offer very comprehensive services, access to great medical care and a very high standard of treatment.
Most programs are designed for people living in poverty, and are not well set up to meet the needs of the substantial numbers of people who do not live in poverty, but at the same time do not have good private health insurance and cannot afford to self finance a very expensive period of residence at a private rehab.
Additionally, due to great demand and limited availability, virtually all state funded treatment beds will maintain a long waiting list. When someone decides to get help for an addiction, therapists encourage that person to get help immediately, before they change their mind, or circumstances change. a long wait time is far from ideal, and derails the transient good intentions of far too many people suffering through addictions.
Still, because many of these facilities do offer quality care, and because this care may be accessed either free of charge or at very low cost, as a good initial step you should call your state health services agency to find out your options. It may not work out, but if a couple of hours of assessment and phone calls gets you into free treatment in a timely manner, your time will have been well spent.
What you need to do?
Call the phone number for your state social services office. these offices are for addictions help so they are ready to assist you in finding care. You will want to ask:
Are subsidized services offered for people with your income?
Where exactly you need to go?
What times each day are assessments done?
What documents you will need to bring?
Do you need to be sober for the assessment?
How long is the waiting list for residential care?
It may not work, you may not be eligible, and the waiting list for service may be unreasonably long; but before you pay for care you cannot afford, or before you give up in frustration on the whole exercise, you should take a few hours to find out whether or not the state can help.
If it works, it’s the best available option.
Remember, you can get better, people do everyday, and you’ll never regret anything you do that gets you there.
Pathways to resolution: The conciliation process of the Australian Human Rights Commission
Posted by Metro in Uncategorized on December 31, 2011
An important role of the Commission is its stautory responsibilities under Australia’s federal human rights and anti-discrimination law. These laws allow people to make complaints to the Commission, for example, if they feel they have been treated unfairly because they are a person of a particular race or sex, or they have a disability. This video provides useful information about the conciliation process for people who have made, or are thinking about making a complaint to the Commission and people or organisations that have had complaints made against them. The Pathways to Resolution program as well as providing an overview of the complaint process, the video: * outlines the various forms the conciliation process may take * explains the role of the conciliator * outlines how parties should prepare for and approach conciliation, and * with reference to an example case study, walks viewers through the various stages of a face-to-face conciliation meeting. For more information, see : www.humanrights.gov.au
In NC two bills have recently been introduced in the Legislature that will change workers’ compensation laws and eliminate protections for injured workers. under HB 709 and SB 544: Injured workers cannot choose their own doctor. The Insurance Company can talk to injured workers’ doctors without their knowledge or consent. if they do not “cooperate” with the doctor the insurance company has chosen, benefits will stop. This portion of the bill “cooks” the system and makes it unfair. further, a worker loses the entire physician/patient privilege, the right to have confidence in their medical provider, and all sense of any fairness or privacy. further, there are unintended consequences with an impact on doctors. Doctors already do not like the workers’ compensation system due to the extra time they have to spend answering questions to insurance companies about legal issues. The questions will be non-stop if insurance companies and defense attorneys can contact the doctors directly without the approval of the employee and this will drive doctors out of the system. Plus, another point that no one seems to be making- is that insurance companies and employers ALREADY direct medical care in NC. Employees can only transfer care at the order of the Industrial Commission. This tips the balance way too far so that employees can NEVER select a doctor of their own choosing. This is unfair especially when other states allow the employee to select the dr. from the very beginning. if you …Video Rating: 5 / 5
Tags: Australian, Commission, conciliation, Human, Pathways, process, Resolution, Rights
This entry was posted on Thursday, December 29th, 2011 at 2:23 pm and is filed under Workman Compensation Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Pathways to resolution: The conciliation process of the Australian Human Rights Commission
Mike's Blog Roundup
Posted by Metro in Uncategorized on December 10, 2011
I hope Nicole (and all other posters) will read this article that was published this morning by Dr. Suzanne L. King in The Berkshire Eagle:
http://www.berkshireeagle.com/otheropinions/c…
Dr. King makes the best argument I have read to date as to why The Public Option is a smokescreen to the American People.
If the American People TRULY want quality, standardized health care for EVERYONE, then our Congresspersons must be told, in no uncertain terms, that we have HAD IT with the for-profit health insurance corporations.
We MUST demand CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN AND COUNT ON.
Calling our Congresspersons, emailing our Congresspersons, snail mailing our Congresspersons will NOT be enough.
We MUST organize NATIONALLY as citizen lobbyists and visit these “SERVANTS” en masse. they must all be given copies of “SICKO” we must DEMAND that they sign on to Conyers H.R. 676 or Sen. Sanders bill in the Senate.
They must be told, in no uncertain terms, that if they do NOT support a Single Payer system for ALL Americans, that we will fight as hard as we can to replace them in their next election cycle.
If they are already co-sponsors of one of those bills, we must visit their LOCAL offices and THANK them for doing so.
This may be the last chance we ever have to make quality, STANDARDIZED health care a reality in this country. and the ONLY way to control the “costs” is to remove the for-profit health insurance corporations/big pharma from the equation AND from our Congresspersons offices!!!!!!
Why Do You Need a Solicitor for Your Personal Injury Case?
Posted by Metro in Uncategorized on November 30, 2011
You may be put off by using a firm of solicitors for your personal injury case, maybe you think it will be too expensive or that they will take most of the money you receive through compensation to cover their costs. however no matter how small your claim a specialist in personal injury law will be able to guide you in the right direction and will probably increase the amount of compensation you receive.
There are two main reasons why you should seek help from a solicitor. Firstly your insurance company you will be making your claim against will always be trying to minimise their losses, there have been cases where they are initially generous in the hope that they will not be hit by a large compensation amount. Secondly without advice from someone who knows the ins and outs of the law you may not know exactly what you are entitled to which could result in the loss of potential compensation.
You may think that representing yourself would save money but in a personal injury case that is not true as most solicitors offer a no-win-no-fee policy which is also be known as a ‘Conditional Fee Agreement’. This means that if you lose your case the firm will not be paid. Legal fees must be paid if the case is successful but personal injury law states that if a claim is a successful the claimant is entitled to have the fees paid by the losing party meaning that there are no extra costs and they can benefit 100% from the compensation.
The courtroom can be a very intimidating environment and self-representation isn’t just a case of being able to stand up for yourself in an argument but it’s also about knowing exactly how the law system works, a professional trains for years to learn the law and how to apply and argue it and there has to be a good reason for this. While representing yourself it is more than likely that you would be faced by a law professional on the opposing bench which might make arguing your case an even tougher task. If you were to look at it from an objective angle you wouldn’t decide to operate on yourself rather than using a doctor, so why take on a personal injury case yourself when there is a professional who will be able to do the very best for you and actually at no extra cost.
